Missouri District Quizzing » Rules http://www.moquiz.org In the beginning was the word . . . Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:33:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 en hourly 1 Quizzing Cycle http://www.moquiz.org/2007/09/quizzing-cycle/ http://www.moquiz.org/2007/09/quizzing-cycle/#comments Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:31:05 +0000 Patrick http://www.moquiz.org/2007/09/05/quizzing-cycle/ The cycle of books we quiz on is posted at http://www.wbqa.org/wbqa_quizcycle.htm. The Nazarene Church follows the WBQA quiz cycle posted there.

]]> http://www.moquiz.org/2007/09/quizzing-cycle/feed/ 0 Pre-Jumping and "multiples" http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/pre-jumping-and-multiples/ http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/pre-jumping-and-multiples/#comments Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:08:45 +0000 Patrick http://moquiz.org/2007/08/07/pre-jumping-and-multiples/ To paraphrase the current rules:

  • quizzer can complete a question as a multiple-part question
    • all the parts of the question MUST be from the same biblical passage
    • if more than one biblical passage is used, only the first question is accepted
  • memory verse questions cannot be answered as multiples
  • all questions must be given before the answers
  • if answers are not in the same order as questions, it is the quizzer’s responsibility to make clear to the quizmaster which answers go with which questions
  • if a quizzer provides incorrect information in any part, the entire answer is incorrect
  • if the quizzer gives the correct question/answer but does not answer all of the additional questions, they are still correct—as long as no erroneous information was provided
]]> http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/pre-jumping-and-multiples/feed/ 0 Rulings on "multiple" questions http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/rulings-on-multiple-questions/ http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/rulings-on-multiple-questions/#comments Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:59:16 +0000 Patrick http://moquiz.org/2007/08/07/rulings-on-multiple-questions/ Question: If a quizzer is answering a question by doing a “multiple” response and gets all the information in without getting the exact question/answer, is it still correct?

Answer: Short answer, no. The end point is that they must answer the question you intended to ask. If they get that info in a form that is answering a different question, then they are incorrect. However, the rules do allow for an “inverse” to be correct. An inverse is where the question they give contains the information from the answer and their answer contains the original question’s information.

If anyone reading disagrees, feel free to let me know or comment on this.

]]> http://www.moquiz.org/2007/08/rulings-on-multiple-questions/feed/ 0